pedophiles and many
other type of sex offenders, such as rapists, sadists,(all the types
of sexual behavior, where human right of another person is infringed,
and violence and cruelty is done)... they seem to be males... and
never female.. is that possible?
Violent crimes done
by females in comparison to males would be a very low.. or could it
be that, some of it doesnt reach popular media.. ?
anyway, is it okay
to make such a group difference based on gender? Could it be, based
on the way females are suppressed? If females are allowed to develop
as they want, and males too, maybe such a difference might not exist,
that is, in a genderless world.. hypothetically that is..
and, what is the
difference between 'sex' and 'gender'? What is politically correct?
What should be the heading, when you want to write, whether a person
is male or female? Should it be noted down, under 'sex' or
'gender'?? (to be honest, i didnt have a clear idea earlier, and
just google it).
Wikipedia
says, “The
sex and gender distinction is not universal. In ordinary speech, sex
and gender are often used interchangeably. Some dictionaries and
academic disciplines give them different definitions while others do
not”.
I am really
surprised – there should be some universal standards, definitions
for some concepts at least.. (its another big argument, we dont have
a metric system, or which side of road should we drive, and so on as
world standards yet).
Anyway, the basic
problem I think is, the need to define a person on the basis of these
2 labels, male & female.. define people on the basis of physical
characteristics... (in his book, 'identity and violence' amartya sen
gives example of, dividing people on the basis of size of feet...
similarly, why do you want to know my sex/gender or size of feet? To
me, size of feet should matter, only when I am buying footwear.
But, humans seem to
enjoy differentiating people into different categories, and creating
groups. It only seem to add to suppression and violence and
infringement of human rights.
I started thinking –
are all animal species, bird species, bug species.. or in short,
various other life forms in the world, divided into these 2 sex
categories?? can every life form be divided in such a way?
Can even humans be
divided in such a way? There are intersex people, who are born
without fully developed sex organs, or with more than one sex organ
and so on. Strictly speaking, from the medical point of view, this
dual category could be more for convenience than, for scientific
reasons. (there is a complex article, on who can be standardized as
male and female, when it comes to athletics, olympics etc.. which
came out, when an indian athlete was disqualified, after this person
won a medal in Asian games (maybe in 2012 or so)... this person
competed in female section of athletics, but based on complex hormone
etc categories, lost out, as didn't qualify as a female.
So, why insist on
such a duality? Why not allow multiplicity as nature again and again
shows us as nature's way?? (I was about to refer to nature as her,
but why should nature have such a thing? If I refer to nature as
male or female, am I referring to sex or gender? …. maybe there
is no need to so much analysis.. just realize, that there is no need
to categorize humans into sex/gender/other physical based
categories.. just as I should oppose, noting down my skin or hair
color, or other physical descriptions, such as tall, short, or fat,
or any other aspects like whether I have 11 or 12 fingers instead of
10... we should maybe start opposing noting down sex or gender down
on forms, our self descriptions.
We have to start
small... take one thing, which can lead to a genderless society...
and oppose the norms.. any ideas?
No comments:
Post a Comment